Posts Tagged ‘Social Media’

Social Media for Business Innovation at The Guardian

April 3, 2011 Leave a comment

Very nice presentation from Mike Bracken of The Guardian at the Gartner 2010 Symposium on leveraging social media for business and organizational innovation.

Bracken starts speaking at approx 5:15 in the video, and a brief cheesy musical clip follows, but the rest of the presentation is excellent. Presentation slides can be viewed here. I’ll have more to say on this video shortly.


Hyperlocal – Key Technologies

February 14, 2010 3 comments

This is the fourth in a series of posts on key dimensions of Hyperlocal. Other posts in this series are:

In this post we consider key enabling technologies that many of the hyperlocal platforms mentioned in previous posts will leverage.

Key Enabling Technologies

The initial post in this series identified the following key enabling technologies for Hyperlocal solutions:

  1. Identity and Personalization
  2. Social Media/Social Web
  3. Real-time Web
  4. Geolocation
  5. Search
  6. Mobile
  7. Machine Learning
  8. Structured Data/Semantic Web

Let’s explore each in turn.

*** Update January 5 2010 ***

It looks like ReadWriteWeb concurs with my identifiation of key enabling technologies for emerging web-based applications. See ReadWriteWeb’s Top 5 Web Trends of 2009. I think leaving out Geolocation is a fairly important omission on RWW’s part. I didn’t make reference to the Internet of Things in my list, but have referred to Web Meets World (another name for the same thing), and its impact on HyperLocal, in previous posts.
*** End of Update ***

Identity and Personalization

Identity is a key part of any online platform these days. Not only does Identity represent one’s online presence, but it’s the basis for relating to other in the context of one’s social graph.

Chris Messina has some great insights into the emergence of Identity as a platform – here’s video of his Identity is the Platform presentation from October 2009, and the slideshow accompanying his talk.

The two key players positioned to dominate the Identity Platform space are:

Identity forms the foundation by which to deliver and manage personalized content for a user. I’m not going to discuss Personalization strategies in detail here, but ReadWriteWeb has an excellent piece on the topic.

Social Media and Social Web

I’m not sure too much needs to be said here. Obviously, Social Media and Social Networks, or what’s often referred to as the Social Graph, is a key feature of the Web today. If you’re going to host and service a Community on your website, you won’t get very far if you don’t design your website for the social web.

Interestingly, the Identity Platforms mentioned in the previous section – OpenID and Facebook Connect – allows you to import the Social Graph from external platforms into your Community site. Alternatively, you may also want to promote your content on other sites on the Social Web – including Twitter and Facebook.

Another important concept to be aware of in the context of the Web and HyperLocal is that of the Social Object. The Social Object is any piece of Content or information that a community might potentially socialize around. So for example, Twitter posts, news articles, photos, business listings, videos, URLs, movies … all are potential social objects that a community might share and discuss.

Social Media is any form of publishing that facilitaties social collaboration and sharing of information, content, and conversation. Social Networking sites, Blogs, Wikis, Microblogging platforms etc. all fall under this category.

The following are just a few of the more popular platforms on the social web:

It’s important on your website to enable key forms of social behavior, including sharing and bookmarking content, commenting, rating and reviewing, and so on. These are features that any social website should support, and the key community platform players, such as Jive, Pluck, and Lithium all support.

Real-time Web

With the viral adoption of Twitter, the real-time web has really taken off of late. To understand the state of the Real-time Web heading into 2010, see the following:

The Real-time Web can be viewed from a number of different angles. Three are:

Real-time Feeds/Sreams

This is the core of the Real-time Web – the underlying real-time feed protocol. Please see:

Real-time Search

Here, see:

Real-time Geo, or Geo-streams

Here, see:

For more on real-time geo and geolocation trends, see the Geolocation section that follows.

Managing the Real-time Firehose of Information

With the Real-time Web, information bursts furth as a massive stream – or firehose – of information, which is then filtered or consumed according to one’s particular social filters and interests. It can be overwhelming at first, as Nova Spivak discusses here.


… This post is a work-in-progress. Please return later to view the completed post.


Your Enterprise is what it communicates – Capgemeni CTO Blog

February 11, 2010 Leave a comment

Andy Mulholland, co-author of the book Mashup Corporations: The End of Business as Usual had a provocative post on his CTO Blog a couple days back titled You are what you eat – or your enterprise is what it communicates.

Man, truer words were never spoken. In his blog post, Mulholland quotes “Conway’s Law”, based on a thesis by Melvin Conway, way back in 1968, which Mulholand summarizes as follows:

Organizations which design systems … are constrained to produce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations

Put somewhat more elaborately, quoting Mulholland:

Essentially Conway’s point was that in designing enterprise business models, computer solutions, even products to take an organisation to market, will always mimic the enterprise’s own communication structure.

Just emphasizes the importance of fostering collaborative internal communication networks across an enterprise, and leveraging social media tools as a core part of a strategy to transform any business organization.


Advertising as Failure – an interesting perspective from Jeff Jarvis

February 10, 2010 Leave a comment

Jeff Jarvis has a provocative post from May 2009 titled Advertising as failure. The essence of Jarvis’ message is this:

  1. The ideal relationship of a company to its customer is direct, with no middleman
  2. Where you don’t have that good relationship, then you have to advertise to tell people something
  3. Therefore, in a very importance sense, Advertising is failure

A really simple insight, but for some reason it hit me like a ton of bricks. But it really speaks to my experience. The products or services that I really love, that I really value, don’t have to advertise to me. In a Google world, I find them and the communities that form around them.

In the following video, starting at around 15:10, Jarvis delivers a really powerful message on Advertising and Marketing:

Here’s a series of rapid-fire messages from Jarvis’ talk gets right to the heart of the matter:

  • If you think about advertising in one way, Advertising is failure
  • If the ideal is that you have a direct relationship and connection with your customer …
  • The ideal is that you have a product that’s so great that they (your customers) tell the world about it, they sell it for you …
  • The ideal is that they help each other and support each other in this product …
  • The ideal is that they trust you and know that you have a human voice and can talk to you …
  • The ideal is a direct relationship with this customer …
  • If all this is the ideal, then why would you advertise?
  • Because if the ideal is to be Google and hardly spend money at all and have a great product that people pass around, then advertising is failure.

That is just brilliant.

Now, as a caveat, Jarvis does say there are valid reason for advertising, for example: (i) nobody knows about my product, it’s brand new, (ii) I’ve had a problem and I fixed it and I’ve got to tell them, (iii) I have a new price and they should know that …

However, Jarvis concludes on the topic of Advertising:

Whatever it is you need to tell them, fine. But it is a fall from grace. Grace is they love me, they move my product, they talk about my product, they support my product, I made the product I wanted because I listened to them and I hear them because I have a relationship, then Advertising is failure.

A couple more recent related posts from Jarvis:

Great stuff.


Social Media is not Community

February 9, 2010 Leave a comment

Just came across a very nice post by Rachel Happe titled Social Media is not Community, posted in July 2008.

Here’s the essence of Rachel’s post:

I’m finding that there is a lot of confusion between the concept of social media and the concept of community. They are often used interchangeably and they are not the same thing. Social media can help foster communities but social media can be limited to allowing a conversation around content…which is *not* community.

Happe goes on to list the following defining characteristics of communities:

  • They are continuous, not temporal – this is not to say that people don’t drop in and out but there is a core membership that interacts together over a long period of time
  • Communities gather around a concept or common goal not around a collection of content (although content does plays a major role, it is not the impetus for the community)
  • Communities take on various conversations and activities, led by different members over time – it is not one conversation but many
  • People within communities get to know each other and interact regularly without centralized facilitation and not necessarily in the context of what the community is discussing as a whole
  • Community leaders emerge over time as they continue to take proactive roles in the community and rally other members to their causes. These leaders are community members and they self-select because of their interests – not because they are told to do so…although they can be encouraged to do so.

Finally, Halle closes off with:

There are two opportunities for enterprises then. 1 – to use social media to enable conversations and get a better idea of how constituents respond to specific content, initiatives, goals. This is much easier both to understand and implement. 2 – to create communities that extend their capabilities and engage their constituents in richer ways that results in higher retention, lower risk, increased ROI, and faster operational capacity. Communities have enormous strategic benefits to companies but require considerable investment (in resources, time, and tools) and are difficult to implement because they have a significant impact on business processes.

Right now the market seems to get social media but we still have a long way to go in helping companies understand the value, requirements, and needs of communities.

A nice piece.

Note: Larry Irons of Skilfill Minds has talks about how the Delloite-sponsored 2008 Tribalization of Business Study supports Halle’s contentions.


Amy Jo Kim – Applying Game Mechanics to Functional Software

February 6, 2010 Leave a comment

Something I’ve only recently encountered as a formal concept – Game Mechanics. Game Mechanics are rules/principles for encouraging users to explore a space through the use of feedback mechanisms. Game Mechanics is important for designing feedback mechanisms to encourage user engagement in Social Media applications. Here’s an article that elaborates on the concept.

One of the leading theorists and practitioners in the field is Amy Jo Kim, of Shuffle Brain. Here’s a video of Amy Jo speaking at Google TechTalks in January 2009:

You can find the presentation slides for her talk here.

Here’s a couple articles on Amy Jo and her approach to Game Mechanics: one from O’Reilly Media, and one from Peter Kim.


User-generated Content (UGC) a core part of BBC’s news-gathering operations

January 30, 2010 Leave a comment

An interesting post by Alfred Hermida – Professor of Journalism at UBC, and former multimedia journalist at the BBC – on how managing User-generated content is now a core part of the BBC’s news gathering operations/workflow. Hermida references a study that was presented by Claire Wardle, Andrew Williams and Karin Wahl-Jorgensen at the Future of Journalism conference in Cardiff.

Quoting Hermida:

The BBC has a dedicated UGC hub that has grown from three people in 2005 to 23 now, and it is physically located by newsgathering, at the heart of the corporation’s news operations.

The researchers found that the UGC hub trawl through comments and submissions for news content and for eyewitnesses to pass on to radio and TV as potential interviewees.

… The researchers concluded that UGC has become institutionalised at the BBC as a form of newsgathering, consolidating the existing relationship between journalists and the audience.

The transformation of news media will continue to see dramatic changes to traditional newsroom editorial workflows, and it’s interesting to see how organizations like the BBC are implementing change in their operations.